I don't have much commentary on this, other than to say that I disavow its position entirely, but I thought it should be preserved and shared, I didn't want to retype it myself (hence the actual screenshot), and at the time of this posting, the following post has not been deleted nor has the poster been chastised or banned by Berg's moderators:
Posted by GK Pace on obamacrimes.us
If the status of the above post and/or poster changes, I will share it. Until then, however, one can only assume that while it's a bannable offense on Berg's forum to question Phil Berg, the rhetoric seen above is apparently acceptable and tolerated.
Update, January 10: GK Pace's post has not been deleted, and I have not seen him warned by moderators. To the contrary, Linda Starr posted this, without mention of Pace:
"Please, if you see something objectionable posted here, let us know. One of us will handle it as soon as we are notified. We want this to be a positive experience for our supporters. It is our supporters who finance Phil's suit and makes possible the existence of this site and blog."
Presumably, the lack of response to GK Pace's post suggests that Berg & Co. do not consider his comments to be objectionable.