tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post4739155335511764950..comments2024-03-17T03:13:50.328-04:00Comments on Barackryphal: Banned from Berg's Blog...I ThinkUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-24077681416495778762009-01-10T22:57:00.000-05:002009-01-10T22:57:00.000-05:00KoyaanWell, they tossed that idea out the window p...Koyaan<BR/>Well, they tossed that idea out the window pretty fast, eh?allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10748027945799167253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-90468275448999887262009-01-10T13:07:00.000-05:002009-01-10T13:07:00.000-05:00The supreme irony about all of this is that shortl...The supreme irony about all of this is that shortly after the website was opened up for commenting (it hadn't allowed comments previously), Berg himself wrote a post welcoming peoples' comments, saying it was a right of free speech protected by the First Amendment.<BR/><BR/>kThe Audio Guildhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13537608563452787245noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-34415815011488252762009-01-08T21:06:00.000-05:002009-01-08T21:06:00.000-05:00Allison - They rented out a former bail-bond shop....Allison - They rented out a former bail-bond shop.<BR/><BR/>They cleaned out a liquor store. :-)<BR/><BR/>sc_dem - Yeah, I've been seeing Linda Starr for a while now. She was busy in the early PUMA blogs before she became Berg's cheerleader. Her own blog hasn't seen an update in months thoughPatGund@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06656672980438683697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-179337486710438992009-01-08T19:58:00.000-05:002009-01-08T19:58:00.000-05:00Hey allison! Thanks for dropping in. And I'm gla...Hey allison! Thanks for dropping in. And I'm glad to hear that the defamatory stuff they said about you wasn't true. I guess you'd posted so much, and had maintained such a nonpartisan tone, that they knew you'd be missed and that they didn't have a legitimate reason for banning you. Hence the manufactured reason.<BR/><BR/>I also can't wait for their reaction. Some folks aren't just crossing their fingers in the hopes of Supreme Court action, they're actively predicting that it will happen. That's just setting yourself up for disappointment.<BR/><BR/>And sc_dem, I saw you got yourself banned from Ed Hale's site. They devoted a whole thread just to announcing your banning and the deletion of your posts.Lorenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10466505033314234610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-18816324590696843402009-01-07T20:40:00.000-05:002009-01-07T20:40:00.000-05:00Oh, Linda is a special kinda bat-sh*t crazy if you...Oh, Linda is a special kinda bat-sh*t crazy if you ask me. And yes, I am all too familiar with PUMA and their wacky merry band of moron antics both pre and post Denver. Oh, and I believe they rented a former bail-bond shop in Denver, not a liquor store. Liquor store mighta explained a lot, though.allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10748027945799167253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-48535597217888944602009-01-07T20:23:00.000-05:002009-01-07T20:23:00.000-05:00Interestingly enough, she has been at this from th...Interestingly enough, she has been at this from the get-go. She is a bonafide original member of the PUMA group - the sad spinoff before PUMApac became 'legitimate'.<BR/><BR/>You know, the group that rented out an abandoned liquor store in Denver during the Dem convention in Denver....sad, sad people.<BR/><BR/>I have a weird feeling that they're all the same person - Linda Starr, Texas Darlin, Citizen Wells, Judah Benjamin, Dr. Kate, etc...sc_demhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222898005053796502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-63096906966149248782009-01-07T19:56:00.000-05:002009-01-07T19:56:00.000-05:00Thanks sc, it was clearly the logic that got me ba...Thanks sc, it was clearly the logic that got me banned!! They don't do too well with logic over there, it apparently "confuses people" (as Lisa pointed out to me). I can't wait to see their reaction when SCOTUS denies the petiton on Monday. ROTFL. I am sure Linda will have some new excuse and a new "smoking gun date" to dangle as a carrot so they can keep separating the fools from their money.allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10748027945799167253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-35906567512507000082009-01-07T19:45:00.000-05:002009-01-07T19:45:00.000-05:00Go Allison! I watched your posts over there. All...Go Allison! I watched your posts over there. All logic, no bias.<BR/><BR/>Banned! Go girl.sc_demhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222898005053796502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-87960207912065972882009-01-07T19:03:00.000-05:002009-01-07T19:03:00.000-05:00I am guessing I was banned because supposedly I wa...I am guessing I was banned because supposedly I was "discouraging people"-- with the TRUTH about the current law/legal processes and by providing links to sources, mind you.<BR/><BR/>Oh, and I did make a comment about Berg's interpleader case inquiring if this may be the one to prompt a Rule 11 motion (meaning FRCP Rule 11, pertaining to sanctions for lawyers, which, I think Berg has earned yet again).allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10748027945799167253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-4137697535444443022009-01-07T18:51:00.000-05:002009-01-07T18:51:00.000-05:00JohnIf you do get a chance to post over at the Ber...John<BR/>If you do get a chance to post over at the Berg nuthouse, feel free to let them know I take issue with the defamatory accusations that were published about me. I harassed no one, I emailed Linda and Lisa to ask why I was getting a "blocked" message and expressed that I would be very disappointed and would have to question the integrity of those running the site were they to simply ban someone for asking questions and sharing information (with sources). Linda, of course, apparently construed that section of my email as harassment. She seems to construe any statement not in agreement with her views as abusive or harassing. The woman seems to be unhinged in some manner. <BR/><BR/>Loren, BTW, great blog!!allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10748027945799167253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-77774958156475404792009-01-07T18:45:00.000-05:002009-01-07T18:45:00.000-05:00I too was banned, and then indeed a "story" was sp...I too was banned, and then indeed a "story" was spread all over the blog that I was "harassing" other bloggers. This claim was pure rubbish, BTW, but thenh again so if just about everthing they say over there...allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10748027945799167253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-66380714750360739222009-01-07T01:33:00.000-05:002009-01-07T01:33:00.000-05:00Wow Loren, I wonder what would happen if I posted ...Wow Loren, I wonder what would happen if I posted over there ;) No doubt I wouldn't last long.<BR/><BR/>Don't let them get to you...when you expose liars, that kind of stuff comes with the territory.<BR/><BR/>John<BR/>SluggoJDSluggoJDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12358214954018338512noreply@blogger.com