tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post6341408066335845817..comments2024-03-17T03:13:50.328-04:00Comments on Barackryphal: "XXXXXXXXXXXX" Spells "Polarik"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-2735234207676744712009-02-02T00:28:00.000-05:002009-02-02T00:28:00.000-05:00TechDude imploded after it was revealed that his h...TechDude imploded after it was revealed that his huge and detailed list of credentials was stolen from a real person.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-3912480870395001502009-01-14T00:45:00.000-05:002009-01-14T00:45:00.000-05:00"Third, Ron Polarik and Sandra Lines are not the o...<I>"Third, Ron Polarik and Sandra Lines are not the only two forensic document experts that have examined these documents and weighed in on them. There is at least one other in the Berg case. </I><BR/><BR/>Yes, Berg cited "TechDude" and even linked to his work early on at his website. <BR/><BR/>And Sandra Lines didn't say anything that Dr. Neil Krawetz didn't say as well. All she said was that you can't tell an electronic scan of something is authentic unless you compared it to the original. She never said it was a forgery.<BR/><BR/>BTW, for the record, I was the one posting as "A REAL American."PatGund@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06656672980438683697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616261316550803840.post-28617997279340515852009-01-13T21:48:00.000-05:002009-01-13T21:48:00.000-05:00So all these folks were conspiring to defraud ever...So all these folks were conspiring to defraud everyone? Is that what he was saying? I refer to factCheck and politfact. I know factCheck is funded by a foundation that I believe Chief Justice Roberts has a relationship with.Mary K Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16523300650931000031noreply@blogger.com